OpenMethods

OpenMethods

HIGHLIGHTING DIGITAL HUMANITIES METHODS AND TOOLS

Menu
Skip to content
  • Home
  • About
  • Who we are
    • Editorial Team
    • Volunteer Editors
  • Join us
  • Submit a content
  • Log in
  • Evaluation criteria
  • Posted on April 14, 2020April 15, 2020
  • by Erzsebet Tóth-Czifra

Ediarum. A toolbox for editors and developers | RIDE

https://openmethods.dariah.eu/2020/04/14/ediarum-a-toolbox-for-editors-and-developers-ride/ OpenMethods introduction to: Ediarum. A toolbox for editors and developers | RIDE 2020-04-14 13:19:59 Introduction: the RIDE journal (the  Review Journal of the Institute for Documentology and Scholarly Editing) aims to offer a solution to current misalignments between scholarly workflows and their evaluation and provides a forum for the critical evaluation of the methodology of digital edition projects. This time, we have been cherry picking from their latest issue (Issue 11) dedicated to the evaluation and critical improvement of tools and environments. Ediarum is a toolbox  developed for editors by the TELOTA initiative at the BBAW in Berlin to generate and annotate TEI-XML Data in German language. In his review, Andreas Mertgens touches upon issues regarding methodology and implementation, use cases, deployment and learning curve, Open Source, sustainability and extensibility of the tool, user interaction and GUI and of course a rich functional overview. [Click 'Read more' for the full post!] Erzsebet Tóth-Czifra https://ride.i-d-e.de/issues/issue-11/ediarum/ Blog post Annotating Contextualizing Data Digital Humanities Editing Encoding English Enrichment Interpretation Metadata Methods Modeling Organizing Research Objects Research Techniques Standards Storage Text Text Bearing Objects Tools BBAW Evaluation JAVA Markup languages OpenSource Oxygen Peer review TEI TEI-XML TELOTA Tool critizism XML

Introduction by OpenMethods Editor (Erzsébet Tóth-Czifra):

One of the major challenges in appropriately crediting DH projects is that the complexities, technical issues and methodological entailments of building digital scholarly objects often remain out of the scope of traditional peer review mechanisms that are rooted in print culture and pertain to research articles, book chapters or books.

The RIDE journal (the  Review Journal of the Institute for Documentology and Scholarly Editing) aims to offer a solution to such misalignment between scholarly workflows and their evaluation and provides a forum for the critical evaluation of the methodology of digital edition projects. This time, we have been cherry picking from their latest issue (Issue 11) dedicated to the evaluation and critical improvement of tools and environments.

Although it is worth to highlight the whole issue, our workflow is designed to republish individual pieces of content and therefore we chose to highlight the review of Ediarum,  a toolbox  developed for editors by the TELOTA initiative at the BBAW in Berlin to generate and annotate TEI-XML Data in German language. In his review, Andreas Mertgens touches upon issues regarding methodology and implementation, use cases, deployment and learning curve, Open Source, sustainability and extensibility of the tool, user interaction and GUI and of course a rich functional overview.

Click to the link below to learn  for which research settings fit Ediarum the best!

Original source: Ediarum. A toolbox for editors and developers | RIDE

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
Posted in Annotating, Contextualizing, Data, Digital Humanities, Editing, Encoding, English, Enrichment, Interpretation, Metadata, Methods, Modeling, Organizing, Research Objects, Research Techniques, Standards, Storage, Text, Text Bearing Objects, ToolsTagged BBAW, Evaluation, JAVA, Markup languages, OpenSource, Oxygen, Peer review, TEI, TEI-XML, TELOTA, Tool critizism, XML

Post navigation

Prev Automatic annotation of incomplete and scattered bibliographical references in Digital Humanities papers
Next Evaluating Deep Learning Methods for Word Segmentation of Scripta Continua Texts in Old French and Latin

Entity-fishing

Markup languages

logo_isidoreIsidore suggestions

    Interested in blogging about your research? The Digital Humanities Tools and Methods blog is for you!

    In cooperation with

    OPERAS

    Categories

    Recent Posts

    • Spanish Paleography Digital Teaching and Learning Tool
    • Mediate: A Collaborative Time-Based Media Annotation Tool for the Web
    • An Engaging Environment for Ancient Chinese Texts: An Introduction to ctext.org
    • Closing the Gap in Non-Latin-Script Data: A tool for building and navigating collections of DH research projects
    • “Multilingual Research Projects: Non-Latin Script Challenges for Making Use of Standards, Authority Files, and Character Recognition”.

    Archives

    Meta

    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org
    OpenMethods © 2017-2018.
    All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a CC BY license. This is in line with DARIAH’s Open Access Policy
    Privacy Notice
    Hosted by – We use
    HaS received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 675570
    Bezel Theme by SimpleFreeThemes ⋅ Powered by WordPress