OpenMethods

OpenMethods

HIGHLIGHTING DIGITAL HUMANITIES METHODS AND TOOLS

Menu
Skip to content
  • Home
  • About
  • Who we are
    • Editorial Team
    • Volunteer Editors
  • Join us
  • Submit a content
  • RSS feeds
  • Log in
  • Posted on October 1, 2018October 16, 2018
  • by Ulrike Wuttke

Forschungsdaten in der (digitalen) Geschichtswissenschaft. Warum sie wichtig sind und wir gemeinsame Standards brauchen – Digitale Geschichtswissenschaft

https://openmethods.dariah.eu/2018/10/01/forschungsdaten-in-der-digitalen-geschichtswissenschaft-warum-sie-wichtig-sind-und-wir-gemeinsame-standards-brauchen-digitale-geschichtswissenschaft/ OpenMethods introduction to: Forschungsdaten in der (digitalen) Geschichtswissenschaft. Warum sie wichtig sind und wir gemeinsame Standards brauchen – Digitale Geschichtswissenschaft 2018-10-01 09:10:18 Introduction: This is a comprehensive account of a workshop on research data in the study of the past. It introduces a broad spectrum of aspects and questions related to the growing relevance of digital research data and methods for this discipline and which methodological and conceptual consequences are involved and needed, especially a shared understanding of standards. Ulrike Wuttke https://digigw.hypotheses.org/2622 Blog post Data Digital Humanities German Images Infrastructure Metadata Methods Research Objects Research Process Sharing Standards Datenmanagementplan Digital Research Digitale Forschungsinfrastrukturen digitale Methoden Digitalisate Erziehungswissenschaften Formate Forschungsdaten Geschichtswissenschaft Kunstgeschichte Linguistik Metadaten Portable Document Format Semantic Web Text Mining Wissenschaftspraxis

Introduction by OpenMethods Editor (Ulrike Wuttke): This is a comprehensive account of a workshop on research data in the study of the past. It introduces a broad spectrum of aspects and questions related to the growing relevance of digital research data and methods for this discipline and which methodological and conceptual consequences are involved and needed, especially a shared understanding of standards.

Wie die geschichtswissenschaftliche Forschung in Zukunft aussehen wird, was möglich sein wird und was nicht, wird auch davon abhängen, wie wir mit unseren Forschungsdaten umgehen, wie wir diese strukturieren, sie zugänglich und austauschbar machen, und welche Standards wir dafür entwickeln.

Source: Forschungsdaten in der (digitalen) Geschichtswissenschaft. Warum sie wichtig sind und wir gemeinsame Standards brauchen

Original date of publication: 17. 09.2018

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
Posted in Data, Digital Humanities, German, Images, Infrastructure, Metadata, Methods, Research Objects, Research Process, Sharing, StandardsTagged Datenmanagementplan, Digital Research, Digitale Forschungsinfrastrukturen, digitale Methoden, Digitalisate, Erziehungswissenschaften, Formate, Forschungsdaten, Geschichtswissenschaft, Kunstgeschichte, Linguistik, Metadaten, Portable Document Format, Semantic Web, Text Mining, Wissenschaftspraxis

Post navigation

Prev If These Crawls Could Talk: Studying and Documenting Web Archives Provenance
Next It’s personal, isn’t it? What personalization means for internet research methods – AoIR

Entity-fishing

Digital Research Erziehungswissenschaften
loading...
Geschichtswissenschaft
loading...
Kunstgeschichte
loading...
Linguistik
loading...
Metadaten
loading...
Portable Document Format
loading...
Semantic Web
loading...
Text Mining
loading...
Wissenschaftspraxis

logo_isidoreIsidore suggestions

    Interested in blogging about your research? The Digital Humanities Tools and Methods blog is for you!

    In cooperation with

    OPERAS

    Categories

    Recent Posts

    • Collaborative Digital Projects in the Undergraduate Humanities Classroom: Case Studies with Timeline JS
    • Getting started with OpenRefine – Digital Humanities 201
    • Annotation Guidelines For narrative levels, time features, and subjective narration styles in fiction (SANTA 2).
    • GitHub – CateAgostini/IIIF
    • Topic-specific corpus building: A step towards a representative newspaper corpus on the topic of return migration using text mining methods – Journal of Digital History

    Archives

    Meta

    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org
    OpenMethods © 2017-2018.
    All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a CC BY license. This is in line with DARIAH’s Open Access Policy
    Privacy Notice
    Hosted by – We use
    HaS received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 675570
    Bezel Theme by SimpleFreeThemes ⋅ Powered by WordPress