OpenMethods

OpenMethods

HIGHLIGHTING DIGITAL HUMANITIES METHODS AND TOOLS

Menu
Skip to content
  • Home
  • About
  • Who we are
    • Editorial Team
    • Volunteer Editors
  • Join us
  • Submit a content
  • RSS feeds
  • Log in
  • Posted on September 7, 2017November 9, 2017
  • by Delphine Montoliu

Génétique éditoriale de la première modernité (compte rendu de la quatrième séance)

https://openmethods.dariah.eu/2017/09/07/genetique-editoriale-de-la-premiere-modernite-_-compte-rendu-de-la-quatrieme-seance-eman/ OpenMethods introduction to: Génétique éditoriale de la première modernité (compte rendu de la quatrième séance) 2017-09-07 08:35:21 Introduction: Here is the fourth E-Man project report on the methodologies for editing ancient texts. Delphine Montoliu http://eman.hypotheses.org/652 Blog post Analysis Annotating Assessing Capture Code Collaboration Collocation Analysis Content Analysis Creation Dissemination Editing Encoding Enrichment French Identifying Information Retrieval Interaction Interpretation Link Literature Manuscript Meta-Activities Metadata Methods POS-Tagging Projects Research Research Activities Research Objects Research Techniques Searching Software Stilistic Analysis Storage Structural Analysis Text Tools Transcription Visualization Web development Writing via bookmarklet

Introduction by OpenMethods Editor (Delphine Montoliu): Here is the fourth E-Man project report on the methodologies for editing ancient texts.

Visualisation des variantes textuelles, approches quantitative et qualitative

 

1. Choix méthodologiques et définition du projet éditorial

 

Lors de la quatrième séance, on est revenu sur les choix initiaux visant à définir le projet

d’édition critique du Thresor des joyeuses inventions et les questionnements que cela

nécessite d’aborder avant de poursuivre une telle édition numérique.

 

Original publication date: 28/02/2017.

Source: Génétique éditoriale de la première modernité _ compte rendu de la quatrième séance | EMAN

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
Posted in Analysis, Annotating, Assessing, Capture, Code, Collaboration, Collocation Analysis, Content Analysis, Creation, Dissemination, Editing, Encoding, Enrichment, French, Identifying, Information Retrieval, Interaction, Interpretation, Languages, Link, Literature, Manuscript, Meta-Activities, Metadata, Methods, POS-Tagging, Projects, Research, Research Activities, Research Objects, Research Techniques, Searching, Software, Stilistic Analysis, Storage, Structural Analysis, Text, Tools, Transcription, Visualization, Web development, WritingTagged via bookmarklet

Post navigation

Prev How does the digital mediates social research? Reflections on the (technical) possibilities of the digital for (post) humanities
Next Exorcisez vos statistiques : contre la malédiction de la dimension

logo_isidoreIsidore suggestions

    Interested in blogging about your research? The Digital Humanities Tools and Methods blog is for you!

    In cooperation with

    OPERAS

    Categories

    Recent Posts

    • Worthäufigkeiten als Quelle für die Geschichtswissenschaft? – Einblicke in die Digital Humanities
    • Fragmentarium: a Model for Digital Fragmentology
    • Offen, vielfältig und kreativ. Ein Bericht zum Barcamp Data Literacy #dhddatcamp20 bei der DHd 2020 | DHd-Blog
    • An end-to-end approach for extracting and segmenting high-variance references from pdf documents
    • Networks in the wild: data analysis and visualization with the Vistorian.

    Archives

    Meta

    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org
    © Copyright 2017-2018 – OpenMethods
    Privacy Notice
    Hosted by – We use
    HaS has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 675570
    Bezel Theme by SimpleFreeThemes ⋅ Powered by WordPress